NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: 711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros [2021] NSWSC 1463 Hearing dates: 9 November 2021 Date of orders: 15 November 2021 Decision date: 15 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Leave to amend Commercial List Cross-Claim List Statement granted. Matter stood over for directions on 19 November 2021. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Cross-claims – against plaintiff – application to amend Commercial List Cross-Claim List Statement to add claim for relief against forfeiture – where clause in lease obliged lessees to pay rent without any deduction or set-off whatsoever – where lessees allege unconscionability on the part of the lessor – whether leave should be refused on basis claim bound to fail EQUITY – relief against forfeiture – where clause in lease obliged lessees to pay rent without any deduction or set-off whatsoever – whether such a clause effective without more to deny relief against forfeiture Cases Cited: 711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros [2018] NSWSC 628 711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros; Tadros v 711 Hogben Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 697 711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros; Tadros v 711 Hogben Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1683 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Hayes v Gunbola Pty Ltd (1986) 4 BPR 9247 High Impact Holdings Pty Ltd v Famhall Pty Ltd [2010] QSC 272 Norman, Re Forest Enterprises Ltd v FEA Plantation Ltd (2011) 195 FCR 97; [2011] FCAFC 99 Palaniappan v Westpac Banking Corporation [2016] WASCA 72 Sneakerboy Retail Pty Ltd t/as Sneakerboy vv Georges Properties Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 996; (2020) 19 BPR 40,443; [2020] NSWSC 996 Wynsix Hotels (Oxford St) Pty Ltd v Toomey [2004] NSWSC 236; (2004) 17 BPR 32,633; [2004] NSWSC 236 Texts Cited: B Edgeworth, Butt's Land Law (7th ed, 2017, Lawbook Co) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: 711 Hogben Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant/Respondent) Anthony Tadros (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Applicant) Sharon Tadros (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Applicant) George Tadros (Third Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: J E Lazarus SC with A A Cameron (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant/Respondent) C D Wood SC (Defendants/Cross-Claimants/Applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate