NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stockham v WLD Practice Holdings Pty Limited [2021] NSWCA 280 Hearing dates: 9 November 2021 Date of orders: 18 November 2021 Decision date: 18 November 2021 Before: Macfarlan JA; Brereton JA Decision: Summons seeking leave to appeal dismissed, with costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – separate questions answered in Equity Division – subsequent attempt to raise additional issues rejected – leave to appeal refused – principle in Anshun 147 CLR 589 applicable APPEALS – procedure – freezing order – sufficient basis for order extending freezing order – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Trustee Act 1925 (NSW), s 63 Cases Cited: Clayton v Bant [2020] HCA 44; (2020) 95 ALJR 34 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589; [1981] HCA 45 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sara Stockham (First Applicant) Sara Stockham Pty Limited (Second Applicant) WLD Practice Holdings Pty Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Gray (Applicants) C Bova SC / D Reynolds (Respondent)
Solicitors: Tony Gye Law (Applicants) Russell Kennedy Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/183320 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Equity – Expedition List Citation: [2021] NSWSC 634; [2021] NSWSC 817 Date of Decision: 04 June 2021 Before: Sackar J File Number(s): 2020/72732
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate