NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dudley v Ainsworth [2021] NSWSC 1478 Hearing dates: 8-9 November 2021 Date of orders: 17 November 2021 Decision date: 17 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Fencing and planting held to constitute nuisance by obstructing plaintiff's rights under easement. Injunctive relief to be granted. Catchwords: LAND LAW – easements – right of carriageway – actionable nuisance – plaintiff's land has the benefit of a right of carriageway 48.645m long over the defendants' land – right of carriageway used as a driveway to access public road – defendants constructed fence along the right of carriageway with 7.4m gap to permit plaintiff access to his land – plaintiff constructed large shed north of the gap and has a barn south-west of the easement area – plaintiff owns numerous vehicles including 11m long bus – whether fence with only 7.4m gap obstructs the plaintiff's enjoyment of rights under the easement – held that fencing impedes or restricts ability of dominant owner to move large vehicles from easement to large shed and from easement to south-western area of the land – real substantial interference with enjoyment of rights – held appropriate to grant injunctive relief to remedy continuation of interference Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 88H, 89(1)(c), 181A, Schedule 8 Part 1 Cases Cited: Coffill v Lagudi Holdings Pty Ltd (2016) 18 BPR 36,483; [2016] NSWSC 1764 Hare v van Brugge (2013) 84 NSWLR 41; [2013] NSWCA 74 Keefe v Amor (1965) 1 QB 334 Panfili v Lawless [2010] NSWSC 79 Powell v Langdon (1944) 45 SR (NSW) 136 Prospect County Council v Cross (1990) 21 NSWLR 601 Sertari Pty Ltd v Nirimba Developments Pty Ltd (2008) NSW ConvR 56-200; [2007] NSWCA 324 Treweeke v 36 Wolseley Road Pty Ltd (1973) 128 CLR 274 Trewin v Felton (2007) 13 BPR 24,579; [2007] NSWSC 851 Westfield Management Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd (2007) 233 CLR 528; [2007] HCA 45 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Raymond Dudley (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) David Ainsworth (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Kylie Leanne Ainsworth (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A M Coombes (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Mr M Bennett (Defendants/Cross-Claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate