NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Archer [2021] NSWSC 1485 Hearing dates: 28 October 2021 Date of orders: 18 November 2021 Decision date: 18 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 19 years and 6 months, with a non-parole period of 13 years and 6 months Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – murder – sentence after trial – single stab wound – assessment of objective criminality – unplanned attack – no intention to kill – where offender armed with knife – deterrence – offender motivated by anger – blamed victim for theft of property – where offender previously convicted of wound with intent – relevance of criminal history – mitigating factors – where based on history provided by offender – offender unreliable and self-serving historian – hearsay evidence not accepted on balance – facilitation of the course of justice – small reduction in sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) s 4 Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) s 25C Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 21A, 22A, 23, 23A, 44, 54A Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 4(2) Cases Cited: Adegoke v R [2013] NSWCCA 193; (2013) 234 A Crim R 280 Apps v R [2006] NSWCCA 290 Devaney v R [2012] NSWCCA 285 Droudis v R [2020] NSWCCA 322; (2020) 103 NSWLR 806 Ghamraoui v R [2009] NSWCCA 111 Hoare v The Queen [1989] HCA 33; (1989) 167 CLR 348 Higgins v R [2020] NSWCCA 169 Khudadadi v R [2021] NSWCCA 259 R v Brooks (No.5) [2017] NSWSC 824 R v Do (No. 4) [2015] NSWSC 512 R v Halloun [2014] NSWSC 1705 R v Hines (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1273 R v Johnson [2015] NSWSC 31 R v M.A.K; R v M.S.K. [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Ruttley (No 7) [2017] NSWSC 1582 R v Spinks [2021] NSWSC 649 R v Sumpton (No. 4) [2015] NSWSC 684 R v Wood [2014] NSWCCA 184; (2014) 244 A Crim R 501 Sumpton v R [2016] NSWCCA 162 Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247 Van Der Baan v R [2012] NSWCCA 5 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Versluys v R [2014] NSWCCA 98 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Richard Archer Representation: Counsel: G Harrison (Regina) T Anderson SC (Archer)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate