NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hong [2021] NSWSC 1487 Hearing dates: 30 September 2021 Date of orders: 18 November 2021 Decision date: 18 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Sentenced to 6 years with a non-parole period of 2 ½ years. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – manslaughter – 62 year old man kills his wife of 30 years – happy normal relationship – frenzied knife attack – inexplicable crime – severe psychiatric illness – where prosecution accepts substantial impairment defence – plea of guilty in the local court – assessment of moral culpability and objective criminality – relevance of reduction of charge pursuant to s 23A – protection of community – substantial adjustment to non-parole period Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 23A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 25D, 44, 54A Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), s 25C Cases Cited: Cargnello v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2012] NSWCCA 162; (2012) 266 FLR 464 FL v R [2020] NSWCCA 114 PK v R [2012] NSWCCA 263 R v Keceski (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW) Mahoney JA, 10 August 1993, unrep) R v Reid (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 475 State of New South Wales v Nikua (Final) [2021] NSWSC 1240 Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247; (2018) 275 A Crim R 233 Veen v R (No.2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Mu Rong Hong Representation: Counsel: G Tabuteau (Regina) G James QC J Jiang (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate