NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Edwards v Curtis [2020] NSWDC 926 Hearing dates: 5, 6, 7 February and 13 May 2020 Date of orders: 15 May 2020 Decision date: 15 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendant. (2) Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs, subject to any application made by email to my associate in the next 14 days. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – personal injury – unit complex – tenant – fall - stairs – lighting – handrail - knee Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002, s 5B, s 5D Limitation Act 1969, s 50C, s 50D Category: Principal judgment Parties: William Edwards (plaintiff) Kerry Frances Curtis (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M McAuley (plaintiff) Mr S E McCarthy (defendant)
Solicitors: Paul A Curtis & Co Solicitors (plaintiff) McCabe Curwood (defendant) File Number(s): 2018/93137 Publication restriction: None
Judgment
A. Introduction 1. William Edwards fell down some stairs in the unit complex where he lived in December 2013. He attributes this fall to defective lighting and the absence of a second handrail. He sues the owner, Kerry Curtis, for damages.
B. Issues 1. The issues that arise in the proceedings are: 1. What was the cause of Mr Edwards' fall. 2. Was the stairwell lighting defective in December 2013. 3. Did Ms Curtis breach a duty of care in respect of the lighting, or the handrail, or in any other respect. 4. Was the claim statute-barred. 5. What is the extent of Mr Edwards' injury, disabilities and damages.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate