NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Klaus v Wallace [2021] NSWCATAP 375 Hearing dates: 16 June 2020 and 11 August 2020 Date of orders: 22 November 2021 Decision date: 22 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K Ransome, Senior Member J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Order 1 made on 20 February 2020 is amended to remove Daniel Klaus as a respondent. Catchwords: APPEAL – consumer claim – liability of person involved in sale of caravan – denial of procedural fairness in adding respondent at hearing – whether respondent is a supplier within the meaning of the Fair Trading Act 1987 – inadequacy of reasons Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Fairey Australasia Pty Ltd v Joyce (1981) 2 NSWLR 314 Jenkinson v Chaw [2015] NSWCATAP 127 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Klaus (Appellant) Leslie James Wallace (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Stone Group Lawyers (Appellant) Respondent (self-represented) File Number(s): 2020/00370725 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 20 February 2020 Before: P Harris, General Member File Number(s): MV 19/44201
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate