NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DQF v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2021] NSWCATAD 351 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 22 November 2021 Decision date: 22 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: The application is dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – privacy – personal information - whether internal review could be conducted by the Respondent's contracted service provider – whether application should be dismissed – whether application is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance Legislation Cited: Administrative Decision Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alchin v Rail Corporation NSW [2012] NSWADT 142 Attorney General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 BDK v Department of Education and Communities [2015] NSWCATAP 129 Choi v Legal Aid Commission of NSW [2020] NSWCATAD 242 Choi v University of Technology Sydney [2019] NSWCATAD 176 CRE v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWCATAD 285 GA v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2005] NSWADTAP 38 Valastar Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWADTAP 84 Category: Principal judgment Parties: DQF (Applicant) Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self-Represented) Department of Communities and Justice, Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00061237 Publication restriction: An order is made under section 64(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) restricting publication of the name of the Applicant in these reasons.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate