NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Casey v Woollahra Municipal Council [2021] NSWLEC 1719 Hearing dates: 26 October 2021 Date of orders: 24 November 2021 Decision date: 24 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Horton C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development Consent No. DA410/2019 is modified in the terms in Annexure A. (3) Development Consent No. DA410/2019 as modified by the Court is Annexure B. (4) Development Consent No. DA107/2020 as modified by the Court pursuant to s 4.17(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 is Annexure C. (5) All exhibits are returned, except Exhibits B, L and 2. Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – heritage significance – effect of proposed development on heritage conservation area – conditions of consent Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.55, 8.9, Land Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014, cl 5.10, Sch 5 Texts Cited: National Construction Code The Burra Charter, the Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance Woollahra Development Control Plan 2015 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Timothy Casey (Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J McKelvey (Applicant) S Puckeridge (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate