NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Munday (No 3) [2021] NSWDC 629 Hearing dates: 19 November 2021 Date of orders: 19 November 2021 Decision date: 19 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Referred to Mental Health Review Tribunal. Conditional release order. See [37] Catchwords: CRIME – Arson - intentionally cause fire and be reckless as to its spread - multiple offences CRIME - Special hearing - Judge Alone hearing – Person unfit to be tried - verdicts "act proven but not criminally responsible"- consequential orders MENTAL HEALTH - Criminal proceedings — Person unfit to be tried - Special hearing – defence of cognitive impairment established – consequent orders - is detention necessary? Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 Crimes Act 1900 Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 Cases Cited: Attorney General of NSW v X (2013) 235 A Crim R 17; [2013] NSWSC 1392 R v Munday (No 2) [2021] NSWDC 628. R v Munday [2021] NSWDC 374 R v Siemek [2021] NSWSC 1292 R v Siemek (No. 2) [2021] NSWSC 1293 R v Tonga [2021] NSWSC 1064 Texts Cited: COVID-19 (coronavirus) Response, Corrective Services NSW; https://www.coronavirus.dcj.nsw.gov.au/services/corrective-services/impact-of-covid-restrictions Category: Consequential orders Parties: Warren Fletcher Munday (the defendant) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Ms S Hall (for the defendant) Ms A Hughes, Solicitor Advocate (for Director of Public Prosecutions)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate