NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ahmed v R [2021] NSWCCA 280 Hearing dates: 25 August 2021 Decision date: 29 November 2021 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Garling and Wright JJ at [64] Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal. (2) Quash the conviction of the applicant for the murder of Khondkar Fariha Elahi and order that there be a new trial. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – unreasonable verdict – trial – judge alone – murder – domestic violence – mental illness – partial defences – whether the accused had a "substantial impairment" – opinion evidence – expert opinion – whether the trial judge unreasonably rejected opinion evidence – Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 23A CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – trial – judge alone – appeal against conviction – new trial – miscarriage of justice – murder – domestic violence – whether a warning should have been given that no adverse inference can be drawn from the failure of an accused to give evidence – where the warning was not mandatory – where the onus lay on the accused to establish a partial defence – whether the warning can be implied from a right to silence direction –Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 133(3) – Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) – Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 23A Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Azzopardi v The Queen (2001) 205 CLR 50; [2001] HCA 25 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Fleming v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 250; [1998] HCA 68 GBF v R [2020] HCA 40; (2020) 94 ALJR 1037 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Peacock v The King (1911) 13 CLR 619; [1911] HCA 66 Quinn v R [2018] NSWCCA 297 R v Ahmed (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 517 R v Byrne [1960] 2 QB 396 R v Trotter (1993) 35 NSWLR 428 R v Welsh (1996) 90 A Crim R 364 R v Wilson (2005) 62 NSWLR 346; [2005] NSWCCA 20 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; [2000] HCA 3 Tarrant v R [2018] NSWCCA 21 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shahab Ahmed (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T F Woods with K Lloyd (Applicant) K Jeffreys (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate