NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Cranston (No 17) [2021] NSWSC 1513 Hearing dates: 23 November 2021 Date of orders: 23 November 2021 Decision date: 23 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wright J Decision: (1) The 11th defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the 11th defendant's amended notice of motion filed on 16 March 2021 and withdrawn and dismissed on 3 November 2021. (2) The costs referred to in order (1) are payable forthwith. Catchwords: COSTS — party/party — costs orders in interlocutory proceedings — application withdrawn and dismissed — analogous to discontinuance of proceedings — general rule that costs follow the event — application of the rule and discretion — timing — costs payable forthwith CRIME — confiscations — restraining order — application for allowance for reasonable living expenses — costs when application not pressed Legislation Cited: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), s 24 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42.1, 42.7, 42.19 Cases Cited: Burbank Montague Pty Limited and Anor v The Owners - Strata Plan 85312 and Anor [2020] NSWSC 1365 Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 32 Doppstadt Australia Pty Ltd v Lovick & Son Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 219 Fordyce v Fordham and Another (2006) 67 NSWLR 497; [2006] NSWCA 274 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 Mahenthirarasa v State Rail Authority of New South Wales and Others (No 2) (2008) 72 NSWLR 273; [2008] NSWCA 201 McNamara v Bao San & Ors [2010] NSWSC 809 Nichols v NFS Agribusiness Pty Ltd (2018) 97 NSWLR 681; [2018] NSWCA 84 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Re the Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Category: Costs Parties: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Rachel Keary (Eleventh Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G O'Mahoney (Plaintiff) M Swanson (Eleventh Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate