NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stojiljkovic v Whittle [2021] NSWCATCD 97 Hearing dates: 28 July 2021 Date of orders: 21 September 2021 Decision date: 21 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: K Ross, Senior Member Decision: 1 On or before 30 November 2021, the respondents are, in a proper and workmanlike manner, to remove the two CCTV cameras which film the common property driveway, and the CCTV camera installed to film the courtyard (the courtyard CCTV camera), and are to provide evidence of compliance to the strata managing agent by that date. 2 If The Owners – Strata Plan No. 83029 is satisfied that the courtyard CCTV camera films only the respondents' lot, and on or before 16 November 2021 passes a special resolution to allow it to remain, then the order in respect of that camera is discharged upon the making of that resolution. Catchwords: LAND LAW — Strata title — Consent for installation of security cameras on common property— Interference in the reasonable use of a lot or common property Legislation Cited: Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) Cases Cited: Nil Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aleksandar Stojiljkovic (First Applicant) Anka Stojiljkovic (Second Applicant) Gordon Whittle (First Respondent) Dorothy Whittle (Second Respondent) Representation: Applicants (Self represented) Respondents (Self represented) File Number(s): SC 21/08985 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate