NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Toth v Stewart & Associates [2021] NSWSC 1522 Hearing dates: 22 March 2021 Date of orders: 26 November 2021 Decision date: 26 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) Extension of time to appeal granted (2) Leave to appeal granted (3) Appeal dismissed (4) Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – advocate's immunity - Magistrate's order for summary dismissal - plaintiff's claim for negligence and breach of contract against solicitors who acted in criminal proceedings - appeal against Magistrate's order - whether Magistrate exhibited bias - whether application an abuse of process - whether Magistrate erred in conducting a "hybrid hearing" conflating immunity with summary judgment - whether Magistrate applied the wrong test - self represented litigant - not his first rodeo - allowance made for pleadings and submissions - scatter gun - whether whole of claim bound to be defeated by immunity - whether disputed facts required resolution in final hearing Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 91L Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW), s 4(1) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Local Court Act 2007 (NSW) ss 39, 40 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 13.4, 14.28 Cases Cited: Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Limited (2016) 259 CLR 1; [2016] HCA 16 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v ZYX Learning Centres Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1676; (2014) 103 ACSR 476 Donnellan v Woodland [2012] NSWCA 433 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1; [2005] HCA 12 Giannarelli v Wraith (1988) 165 CLR 543; [1988] HCA 52 Golden v Koffel [2021] NSWSC 739 Keefe v Marks (1989) 16 NSWLR 713 Kendirjian v Lepore (2017) 259 CLR 275; [2017] HCA 13 Macatangay v NSW (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 272 Nikolaidis v Satouris [2014] NSWCA 448; (2014) 317 ALR 761 Rees v Sinclair [1974] 1 NZLR 180 Toth v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2017] NSWCA 344 Toth v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2018] NSWCA 253 Young v Hones [2014] NSWCA 337 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure [13.1.65] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Toth (Plaintiff) Stewart & Associates (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Lloyd SC and S Andrews (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate