NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Estate of Sikos v TBPL1 Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1523 Hearing dates: 19 November 2021 Decision date: 26 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Security for costs ordered; application to stay proceedings and strike out paragraphs of the List Statement refused Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) – where s 25 judgment entered in favour of builder – where time to claim damages under building contract out of time – where earlier proceedings claiming damages under building contract discontinued – where principals now seek declaration of the parties' rights under the building contract purportedly in aid of injunction to restrain builder from being unjustly enriched by enforcing the s 25 judgment – whether such a claim is liable to be struck out CIVIL PROCEDURE – stay of proceedings – application by reason of unpaid costs in earlier proceedings – whether same or substantially the same cause of action in these proceedings as in those earlier proceedings COSTS – security for costs – relevant factors – impecuniosity – whether proceedings in substance defensive – other factors Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001(Cth) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd v Mistrina Pty Ltd (in liq) [2021] NSWSC 449 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Grosvenor Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd (in admin) v Musico [2004] NSWSC 344 In the matter of Cooperbrown Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1341 In the matter of Force Corp Pty Ltd (in liq) [2020] NSWSC 1842; 149 ACSR 451 In the matter of Ming Tian Real Property Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 212; 145 ACSR 329 Mistrina Pty Ltd v Australian Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 223 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: The Estate of Elias Sikos (First Plaintiff/Respondent) Mistrina Pty Ltd (in liq) (Second Plaintiff/Respondent) TBPL1 Pty Ltd (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: D Hume (First Plaintiff/Respondent) N J Kidd SC with F Salama (Defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate