NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Lorebray Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1533 Hearing dates: 23 November 2021 Date of orders: 23 November 2021 Decision date: 23 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Court declares the appointment of the directors to have been valid and that resolutions passed at meetings with a quorum of two directors are not invalid on that basis. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS — Meeting of members — Resolutions — Where deed of settlement and release required the parties to take reasonable steps to ensure that certain persons would be directors of the company and associated companies — Inconsistency between constitution and shareholders agreement as to quorum — Where constitution provided for quorum of two directors — Where shareholders agreement provided for quorum of three directors, being all the company's directors — Whether company can hold quorate board meeting in the circumstances — Where one director representing a shareholder has resigned and replacement appointee does not accept appointment. CORPORATIONS — Directors and officers — Appointment, removal and retirement of directors — Where the relevant shareholders were parties to deed of settlement and release — Where deed of settlement required the execution of certain directorship documents — Whether s 249A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) applies — Where general law concept of unanimous consent or s 1322(4) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) otherwise applies. Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 249A, 1322 Cases Cited: - Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 99; [1973] HCA 36 - Aveo Group Ltd v State Street Australia Ltd [2015] FCA 1019 - Citi Project Marketing (Qld) Pty Ltd v VG Projects Pty Ltd [2018] 1 Qd R 100; [2017] QSC 065 - Donaldson v Natural Springs Australia Ltd [2015] FCA 498 - Eastone Mining Pty Ltd v Eastone Holding Pty Ltd (2019) 142 ACSR 38; [2019] NSWSC 1850 - Elders Forestry Ltd v Bosi Security Services Ltd (2010) 242 FLR 360; (2010) 80 ACSR 122; [2010] SASC 223 - Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; (2014) 306 ALR 25; [2014] HCA 7 - Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421; [1972] HCA 61 - Hawcroft v Jamieson [2017] NSWSC 1478 - HDI Global Specialty SE v Wonkana No 3 Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 296 - Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd v Coopers Brewery Ltd (2006) 156 FCR 1; (2006) 236 ALR 561; [2006] FCAFC 144 - Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; (2015) 325 ALR 188; [2015] HCA 37 - Re Lesso Building Material Trading (Sydney) Pty Ltd (admins apptd) [2018] NSWSC 1486 - Re Rectron Electronics Pty Ltd [2013] VSC 384 - Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd, v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2014) - 219 CLR 165; (2004) 211 ALR 342; [2004] HCA 52 - Weinstock v Beck (2013) 251 CLR 396; (2013) 93 ACSR 231; [2013] HCA 14 - Zhang v ROC Services (NSW) Pty Ltd (2016) 93 NSWLR 561; [2016] NSWCA 370 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Originating Process McMardi Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Red Hill MCN Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Lorebray Pty Ltd (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate