NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Coburn (NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment) v Cool-Off Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLC 6 Hearing dates: 1-5 February 2021,19-23 July 2021, 29 October 2021 Date of orders: 29 October 2021 Decision date: 29 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Donnelly LCM Decision: The defendant is found not guilty and the charge is dismissed. Catchwords: Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, ss 2.5(c), 13.9 offence of procuring an offence of dealing in a protected animal (kangaroo) – whether offence under s 2.5(c) is an offence of absolute or strict liability – whether common law ground of exculpation of honest and reasonable mistake of fact is available to the alleged principal and also secondary participant – CTM v The Queen (2008) 236 CLR 440 applied – s 13.9 – application of common law doctrine of accessorial liability of aid abet, counsel and procure to a charge laid under s 13.9 – ingredients of offence that the prosecution must prove where the offence allegedly committed by principal is a strict liability offence – Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473 applied – requirement of prosecution to prove knowledge and intention on part of secondary participant – defendant not guilty on basis that prosecution failed to prove the ingredient of knowledge Legislation Cited: Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bateman v Evans (1964) 108 Sol Jo 522 Blundell v R [2019] NSWCCA 3 Carter v Mace [1954] 3 All ER 243 Clayton v The Queen [2006] HCA 58 CTM v The Queen (2008) 236 CLR 440 Decision Restricted [2019] NSWCCA 226 De Silva v The Queen [2019] HCA 48 Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473 He Kaw Teh v The Queen (1985) 157 CLR 523 Holloway v Gilport Pty Ltd; Holloway v Zygaldo (1995) 79 A Crim R 76 Johnson v Youden [1950] 1 KB 544 Miller v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 380 Proudman v. Dayman (1941) 67 CLR 536 R v Glennan (1970) 91 WN (NSW) 609 R v Sheehan [1999] QCA 461 R v Tolson (1889) 23 QBD 168 R v Russell (1933) VLR 59 Smith v Jenner (1968) Crim.LR 99 Stokes and Difford v R (1990) 51 A Crim R 25 Thomas v Lindop [1950] 1 All ER 966 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jennifer Coburn, NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (Prosecutor) Cool-Off Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Garsia (Prosecutor) C Ireland SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate