NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tout v Johnson (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1543 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 30 November 2021 Decision date: 30 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: See at [9] and [13]. Catchwords: COSTS – departure from the general rule – where plaintiff unsuccessful in obtaining relief at final hearing – whether costs of various interlocutory applications warrant a departure from the general rule – held that some departure warranted – order that defendants pay certain costs and otherwise that the plaintiff pay the costs of the proceedings COSTS – gross sum order – held the evidence does not establish likelihood that the plaintiff will be unable to pay defendants' costs once assessed – held that evidence does not place Court in position to be confident it could resolve challenges about amount of costs on a fair and logical basis – gross sum costs order declined Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(4)(c) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 88K Cases Cited: Tout v Johnson [2021] NSWSC 1311 Category: Costs Parties: Michelle Tout (Plaintiff) Brendan Charles Johnson (First Defendant) Jodie Gail Williams (Second Defendant) The Office of the Registrar-General (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Joseph (Plaintiff) Mr S Lipp (First and Second Defendants)
Solicitors: Lindeman Lawyers (Plaintiff) Downeys Lawyers Pty Ltd (First and Second Defendants) File Number(s): 2019/375183 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate