NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: IWC Industries Pty Ltd v Sergienko [2021] NSWCA 292 Hearing dates: 4 August 2021 Date of orders: 1 December 2021 Decision date: 01 December 2021 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Ward JA at [2] Gleeson JA at [3] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed. (2) Appellants to pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: EQUITY – equitable interests in real property – priorities – where property purchased by trustee on trust for sole unitholder – competing claims of beneficiary under trust and equitable mortgagee – where beneficiary did not pay any monies towards purchase price of property or "fully paid" units in unit trust – where beneficiary's solicitor advised trustee was untrustworthy – where trust deed conferred wide powers on trustee, including power to mortgage trust assets for any contractual obligation – where trust deed precluded unitholder from lodging caveat against any trust property and no caveat was lodged – where equitable mortgage granted over property to respondent in breach of trust – whether merits of competing equities unequal – whether beneficiary's prior interest postponed to subsequent interest of equitable mortgagee EQUITY – equitable interests in real property – priorities – where unitholder issued "fully paid" units but no monies paid for units in trust or towards purchase of property – whether evidence that trustee borrowed funds for purchase of property – whether beneficiary has liability to trustee for units issued to it – whether beneficiary was a volunteer Legislation Cited: Merchant Shipping Act 1894, 57 & 58 Vic, c 60, s 56 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: Abigail v Lapin (1934) 51 CLR 58; [1934] AC 491 AG(CQ) Pty Ltd v A & T Promotions Pty Ltd [2011] 1 Qd R 306; [2010] QCA 83 Australia Capital Financial Management Pty Ltd v Linfield Developments Pty Ltd; Guan v Linfield Developments Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 99; 18 BPR 36,683 Australian Guarantee Corp (NZ) Ltd v CFC Commercial Finance Ltd [1995] 1 NZLR 129 Australian Property & Management Pty Ltd v Devefi Pty Ltd (NSWSC, Young J, 7 April 1997); (1997) 7 BPR [97,640] Betlehem v Keytown Constructions Pty Ltd (formerly known as Jadestar Investments Pty Ltd) [2007] WASC 38 Black v Garnock (2007) 230 CLR 438; [2007] HCA 31 Bradley v Riches [1876] 9 Ch D 189 Brocklesby v Temperance Permanent Building Society (1895) AC 173 Burgis v Constantine [1908] 2 KB 484 Cash Resources Australia Pty Ltd v BT Securities Ltd [1990] VR 576 Carritt v Real and Personal Advance Company (1889) 42 Ch D 263 Clark v Raymor (Brisbane) Pty Ltd (No 2) [1982] Qd R 790 Coleman v London County & Westminster Bank Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 353 Cory v Eyre (1863) 1 De GJ & S 149; 46 ER 58 CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (2005) 224 CLR 98; [2005] HCA 53 Dixon v Mucklestone (1872) LR 8 Ch App 155 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Glengallen Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 471; [2004] HCA 55 General Finance Agency & Guarantee Co Ltd v Perpetual Executors & Trustees Association Ltd (1902) 27 VLR 739 Gifford v Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty Ltd (2003) 214 CLR 269; [2003] HCA 33 Heid v Reliance Finance Corp Pty Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 326; [1983] HCA 30 Hill v Peters [1918] 2 Ch 273 IAC (Finance) Pty Ltd v Courtenay (1963) 110 CLR 550; [1963] HCA 64 J & H Just (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Bank of New South Wales (1971) 125 CLR 546; [1971] HCA 57 Koorootang Nominees Pty Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1998] 3 VR 16 Lapin v Abigail (1930) 44 CLR 166; [1930] HCA 6 Latec Investments Ltd v Hotel Terrigal Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (1965) 113 CLR 265; [1965] HCA 17 Lintel Pines Pty Ltd v Nixon [1991] IVR 287 Meth v C.B.C. (NSWSC, Shepperd J, 8 December 1976, unreported); (1977-1978) CLC 40-302 Moffett v Dillon [1999] 2 VR 480; [1999] VSCA 32 Parsons v McBain (Trustee of estate of PF Parsons (a bankrupt)) [2001] FCA 376; (2001) 109 FCR 120 Perilya Broken Hill Pty Ltd v Valuer-General [2015] NSWCA 235; (2015) 10 APLR 235 Platzer v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1997] 1 Qd R 266 Re Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 1) [2017] VSC 499 Rice v Rice (1853) 2 Drew 73; 61 ER 646 Rimmer v Webster [1902] 2 Ch 163 Shropshire Union Railways and Canal Co v The Queen (1875) LR 7 HL 496 Taylor v London and County Banking Co [1901] 2 Ch 231 Thorpe v Bristle Ltd (1997) 80 FCR 330 Valoutin Pty Ltd v Furst (1998) 154 ALR 119 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491; [1998] HCA 12 Texts Cited: B Edgeworth, Butt's Land Law (7th Ed, LawBook Co, 2017) Category: Principal judgment Parties: IWC Industries Pty Ltd (First appellant) DK Excavation and Concreting Pty Ltd (Second appellant) Sergei Sergienko (First respondent) AXL Financial Pty Ltd (Second respondent) Representation: Counsel: F Corsaro SC / T Rogan (Appellants) B Coles SC / D Meyerowitz-Katz (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate