NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Grant [2021] NSWDC 643 Hearing dates: 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 and 22 November 2021 Date of orders: 26 November 2021 Decision date: 26 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Hatzistergos DCJ Decision: 1. Guilty in respect of Count 1 2. Guilty in respect of Count 2 3. Guilty in respect of Count 3 Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW –– Driving offences – Dangerous driving occasioning death – Failing to stop and assist – Police pursuit – Where the Accused was under the influence of intoxication CRIMINAL LAW –– Judge alone trial – Where the Accused relies on an involuntary act – Where the Accused relies on previous medical conditions rendering his ability to have been cognitively aware of his offending conduct – Where the main defence relied upon was somnambulism – Where the hypotheses relied upon by the Defence was not supported by the expert evidence – Where the offences have been proven beyond reasonable doubt Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 51B, 52A, 52AB Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) ss 133, Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 136 Cases Cited: Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47 Fleming v R (1998) 197 CLR 250 The Queen v Falconer (1990) 171 CLR 30 Yousef v R (1990) 50 A Crim R 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (the Crown) Kenneth Wayne Grant (the Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr L Carr SC (the Crown) Mr P Boulten SC (the Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate