NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Swiss Concept Australia Pty Ltd v Diamondlite Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATCD 106 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 14 October 2021 Decision date: 14 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: The decision issued on 15 October 2021 is amended under Section 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, and should read as follows: (amendments are shown in bold type) (1) Pursuant to s 50 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) the applicant's money claims will be determined on the basis of the parties' written submissions and without a further hearing. (2) The respondent, Diamondlite Pty Ltd, is to pay the applicant, Swiss Concept Pty Ltd, the sums of $72,766.29, $15,528 and $24,010.96, totalling $112,305.25, immediately. (3) The respondent, Diamondlite Pty Ltd, is to pay Swiss Concept Pty Ltd the sum of $46,584 by eighteen equal instalments of $2,588, payable on the first of each month commencing 1 November 2021 with the final payment due on 1 April 2023. Catchwords: LEASES AND TENANCIES — Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) — Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Regulations — Claim by landlord for unpaid rent — Tenant "impacted lessee" for purposes of Regulations — Rent relief in accordance with the National Cabinet Mandatory Code of Conduct — SME Commercial Leasing Principles during COVID-19 —Parties failed to agree terms on which the tenant would be granted relief —Whether Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine terms of relief — Parties agreed Tribunal should make determination —Approach to determination Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Retail and Other Commercial Leases (Covid-19) Regulation 2020 (NSW) Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Regulation (No 2) 2020 (NSW Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Regulation (No 3) 2020 (NSW) Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) Cases Cited: Darzi Group Pty Ltd v Nolde Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 774 Miramax Pty Ltd v Mang Yu Lo [2021] NSWCATCD 12 Sneaker Boy Retail Pty Ltd t/as Sneaker Boy v Georges Properties Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1141 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Swiss Concept Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant) Diamondlite Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Concisus Legal Pty Ltd (Applicant) File Number(s): COM 21/24344 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate