NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ranclose Investments Pty Ltd v Leda Management Services Pty Ltd & Anor [2021] NSWDC 651 Hearing dates: 12 and 30 November, 1 December 2021 Date of orders: 2 December 2021 Decision date: 02 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: Order: (1) Refuse leave to the plaintiff to reopen its case; plaintiff's application for a further adjournment of the defendants' application is refused. (2) Statement of claim dismissed. (3) Cross-claim dismissed. (4) The plaintiff/ first cross-defendant, Ranclose Investments Pty Ltd, is to pay the costs of the claim and the cross-claim as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: COSTS – security for costs – plaintiff ordered to pay security for costs in two tranches totalling $150,000 – plaintiff brings application to vary the order to provide for five tranches of $30,000 – plaintiff fails to pay first $30,000 – application for dismissal of proceedings – plaintiff granted an extension of time to pay the first $30,000 but fails to do so - plaintiff fails to pay second tranche – defendants point to unlikelihood of plaintiff complying with the security orders in the future and to issues of prejudice – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by plaintiff to reopen its case after judgment reserved – application refused – statement of claim and cross-claim dismissed Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 127 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) ("UCPR") rr 12.10 and 42.2(3) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56 and 66 Cases Cited: Ballard v Brookfield Australia Investments Ltd [2013] NSWCA 82 Bell Wholesale P/L v Gates Export Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [1984] FCA 29 Chandra v Perpetual Trustee Victoria Limited [2006] NSWSC 1046 City of Sydney Council v Satara [2007] NSWCA 148 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Liu (2012) 90 ATR 614 Farnell v Penhalluriack [2010] 29 VR 727 First Tiffany Resource Corporation v Hill End Gold Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1713 Gaskin v Ollerenshaw [2010] NSWSC 788 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2002] NSWSC 18 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 271 In the matter of AAMAC Warehousing and Transport Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2014] NSWSC 834 Kane v Wyllie [2006] NSWSC 710 Porter v Gordian Runoff Ltd (No 3) [2005] NSWCA 377 Ranclose Investment Pty Ltd v Leda Management Services Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 210 Ranclose Investments Pty Ltd v Leda Management Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] NSWDC 288 Tjiong v Tjiong [2021] NSWSC 1389 Tripod Fund Management Pty Ltd v Shao [2014] NSWSC 1722 Urban Transport Authority of New South Wales v Nweiser (1992) 28 NSWLR 471 Vale v Vale [2001] NSWCA 245 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Ranclose Investments Pty Ltd Defendants: First Defendant: Leda Management Services Pty Ltd Second Defendant: Leda Holdings Pty Ltd
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate