NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Krivosic (No. 6) [2021] NSWSC 1572 Hearing dates: 25 November 2021 Date of orders: 26 November 2021 Decision date: 09 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: The Court declines to leave manslaughter by criminal negligence to the jury. Catchwords: CRIME – murder trial – second trial after jury unable to agree upon verdict at first trial – defence application to leave manslaughter by criminal negligence to jury – trial Judge declined same application at first trial – application of s.130A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 – deceased shot by pistol being held by Accused – issue at trial as to whether discharge of firearm deliberate or accidental – Crown case that pistol fired by Accused with intent to kill or to inflict grievous bodily harm – whether Accused owed duty of care to deceased – whether scope and content of hypothetical duty is ascertainable – Court declines to leave manslaughter by criminal negligence to the jury Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Criminal Code (Qld) Criminal Code (WA) Cases Cited: Burns v The Queen (2012) 246 CLR 334; [2012] HCA 35 Callaghan v The Queen (1952) 87 CLR 115; [1952] HCA 55 Chapman v Gentle (1987) 28 A Crim R 29 Herron v Attorney General (NSW) (1987) 8 NSWLR 601 James v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 475; [2014] HCA 6 Koani v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 427; [2017] HCA 42 Lane v R (2013) 241 A Crim R 321; [2013] NSWCCA 317 Martinez v R [2019] NSWCCA 153 Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107; [1971] HCA 20 R (Cth) v Petroulias (No. 1) (2006) 177 A Crim R 153; [2006] NSWSC 788 R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1; [2009] NSWCCA 102 R v Dirani (No. 8) [2018] NSWSC 1000 R v Doherty (1887) 16 Cox CC 306 R v Krivosic [2021] NSWSC 506 R v Krivosic (No. 5) [2021] NSWSC 1566 Mickelberg v R (No. 3) (1992) 8 WAR 236 R v Moore (2015) 91 NSWLR 276; [2015] NSWCCA 316 R v Taktak (1988) 14 NSWLR 226 Texts Cited: --- Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Marko Krivosic (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms M England; Mr BG Page (Crown) Mr N Steel (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate