NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Loumbos v Gray as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) [2021] NSWSC 1579 Hearing dates: 1-2 December 2021 Decision date: 06 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendants. (2) Reserve costs. (3) List the matter for argument on costs at 9.00am on Tuesday 7 December 2021. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE — plaintiff claims damages for alleged negligence and misleading and deceptive conduct — whether the defendants were the plaintiff's solicitors and owed him duties of care and fiduciary duties — plaintiff was not the defendants' client at the relevant time — consideration of limited circumstances in which solicitor holds a duty to a third party — interests of plaintiff were potentially in conflict with defendants' client's — defendants did not owe plaintiff a fiduciary duty — defendants may have owed a duty at common law or as fiduciary to their client to encourage the plaintiff to obtain independent legal advice — no breach of any duty established — the factual matrix of the misleading and deceptive conduct claim not made out NEGLIGENCE — causation — scope of liability — consideration of what plaintiff would have done if defendants had advised him to obtain independent legal advice — not persuaded on the evidence that the plaintiff would have taken a different course or there would have been a different outcome if he did — plaintiff failed to discharge onus EVIDENCE — credibility of witnesses — contest of fact between witnesses — plaintiff had poor recollection, inconsistencies between oral evidence and evidence in earlier proceedings, and contemporaneous documents favour the defendants' case — determination that the evidence supports the defendants' case Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5D, 5E Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66W Cases Cited: Badenach v Calvert (2016) 257 CLR 440; [2016] HCA 18 Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd v Stavar (2009) 75 NSWLR 649; [2009] NSWCA 258 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658; [1982] HCA 70 Hill v Van Erp (1997) 188 CLR 159; [1997] HCA 9 Loumbos v Ward [2016] NSWSC 885 Onassis v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyds Rep 403 Ward v Loumbos [2017] NSWCA 35 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Valentine Loumbos (Plaintiff) John James Montgomery Gray as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (First Defendant) Miles Robert Anderson as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Second Defendant) Richard Michael Burr as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Third Defendant) Steven Mark Cardell as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Fourth Defendant) Dale Francis Cliff as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Fifth Defendant) Timothy John Crumpton as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Sixth Defendant) Timothy David Ferrier as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Seventh Defendant) John Richard Paul Hunt as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Eighth Defendant) Peter Lorrimer Karcher as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Ninth Defendant) Paul Michael O'Dea as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Tenth Defendant) Bernard Francis Tan as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Eleventh Defendant) John Dominic Toigo as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Twelfth Defendant) Belinda Eliza Hapgood (nee Weir) as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Thirteenth Defendant) Shane Russell Williamson as a named partner of ClarkeKann (ABN 92 990 809 254) (Fourteenth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: In person (Plaintiff) A Horvath SC (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate