NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hitchen v R [2021] NSWCCA 293 Hearing dates: 29 November 2021 Date of orders: 10 December 2021 Decision date: 10 December 2021 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Harrison J at [2] Wilson J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME — appeal against sentence — knowingly take part in supply of commercial quantity of methylamphetamine — possess unauthorised firearm — whether error in determining objective seriousness of applicant's role — manifest excess — parity — where applicant showed limited remorse — where guilty plea entered at late stage —poor prospects of rehabilitation — no error found — appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Chamon v R [2020] NSWCCA 112 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144 Munro v R [2006] NSWCCA 350 Owen v R [2017] NSWCCA 54 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383; [1981] HCA 31 R v Hitchen [2020] NSWDC 753 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374; (1997) 90 A Crim R 587 R v Qutami (2001) 127 A Crim R 369; [2001] NSWCCA 353 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Geoffrey Hitchen (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Voleynik (Applicant) C Dodds (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate