NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Top Hut Banoon Pastoral Co Pty Ltd t/as Trustee for the Wakefield Family Trust v Walker [2021] NSWCA 296 Hearing dates: 24 November 2021 Date of orders: 8 December 2021 Decision date: 08 December 2021 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Preston CJ of LEC at [86] Stevenson J at [87] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed. (2) Appellant to pay the respondents' costs. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – liability of employer – scope of employer's obligation to ensure safe system of work – where employee worked as shearers' cook – where employee dispatched to other place or premises of work – where employee injured when step to accommodation collapsed – where employer conducted visual inspection of premises – whether scope of employer's duty required employer to conduct physical inspection of the step – whether employer breached duty – whether causation established DAMAGES – past and future economic loss – where employee suffered from PTSD and diabetes – where employee's income in prior financial years modest – where unchallenged findings that job suited employee's PTSD and intended to work full-time – where primary judge allowed deduction of 30 per cent for vicissitudes – whether error in award of past economic loss – whether error in award of future economic loss – whether error by primary judge not to refer to appellant's medical reports material DAMAGES – past domestic assistance and future commercial care – where employee's son and friend provided gratuitous domestic assistance – whether threshold under s 15(3) Civil Liability Act met – where evidence that employee wanted to relieve son of duties of providing care – where future commercial care assessed at 8.5 hours a week – where primary judge allowed deduction of 15 per cent for vicissitudes – whether primary judge erred in award for past domestic assistance – whether primary judge should have allowed for greater reduction for vicissitudes Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 3B, 13, 15 Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 151E Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: AEA Constructions Pty Ltd v Wharekawa; AEA Constructions Pty Ltd v Building Partners Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 176 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Haq [2016] NSWCA 93 Avopiling Pty Ltd v Bosevski; Avopiling Pty Ltd v The Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (2018) 98 NSWLR 171; [2018] NSWCA 146 Barnes v State of New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 254 Brocx v Mounsey [2001] WASCA 196 Crimmins v Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee (1999) 200 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 59 Dib Group Pty Ltd Trading as Hill & Co v Cole (2009) Aus Torts Reports 82-022; [2009] NSWCA 210 Graham v Baker (1961) 106 CLR 340; [1961] HCA 48 HSH Hotels v Multiplex [2004] NSWCA 302 Kember v Thackrah [2000] WASCA 198 Koeck v Persic (1996) Aus Torts Reports 81-386, 63,360 Metaxoulis v McDonald's Australia Limited [2015] NSWCA 95 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541; [2018] HCA 30 Nestle Australia Ltd v McDougall [1998] NSWCA 158 Prouten v Chapman [2021] NSWCA 207 Sampco Pty Ltd v Wurth [2015] NSWCA 117 South Sydney Junior Rugby League Club Ltd v Gazis [2016] NSWCA 8 Sretenovic v Reed [2009] NSWCA 280 Taupau v HVAC Constructions (Queensland) Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 293 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Top Hut Banoon Pastoral Co Pty Ltd t/as Trustee for the Wakefield Family Trust (Appellant) Julie Walker (First respondent) Shear Away Pty Ltd (Second respondent) Representation: Counsel: M J McCulloch SC (Appellant) B D Dooley SC / J C Lee (First respondent) P A Rickard (Second respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate