NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Muscat Developments Pty Ltd trading as Muscat Developments v Wollondilly Shire Council [2021] NSWLEC 1758 Hearing dates: 14, 15 and 16 September 2021 Date of orders: 10 December 2021 Decision date: 10 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Clay AC Decision: The Court makes the following direction: (1) The parties shall within 7 days file an agreed set of conditions in accordance with the reasons for judgment. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – change of use from poultry farm to two depots – use of fill unlawfully brought onto site – contamination – remediation and re-use of contaminated fill – removal of contaminated fill – relevance of Protection of the Environment Operations Act licensing provisions – impact on existing and desired character of the area – loss of land for agriculture – visual impact – protection of scenic and cultural landscapes – conditions Legislation Cited: Coal Mine Subsidence Compensation Act 2017, s 22 Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 8.7 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 55 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 39 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, ss 48, 144AAB, Schedule 1 State Environmental Planning Policy 55 – Remediation of Land, cl 7 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan 20 – Hawkesbury-Nepean River (No 2—1997), cll 3, 4, 6 Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Amendment No 40) Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011, cll 1.8A, 2.3, 5.10, 7.5, 7.9, Dictionary, Land Use Table Cases Cited: BGP Properties Pty Limited v Lake Macquarie City Council (2004) 138 LGERA 237; [2004] NSWLEC 399 Environment Protection Authority v Grafil Pty Ltd; Environment Protection Authority v Mackenzie (2019) 101 NSWLR 245; [2019] NSWCCA 174 Jeffrey v Canterbury Bankstown Council [2021] NSWLEC 73 Maule v Liporoni (2002) 122 LGERA 140; [2002] NSWLEC 25 Maygood Australia Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2013] NSWLEC 142 McDougall v Warringah Shire Council (1993) 30 NSWLR 258 Motbey v Hollis and Eurobodalla Shire Council (2003) 124 LGERA 227; [2003] NSWLEC 40 Taralga Landscape Guardians Inc v Minister for Planning and RES Southern Cross Pty Ltd (2007) 161 LGERA 1, [2007] NSWLEC 59 Terrace Tower Holdings v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 195; [2003] NSWCA 289 Texts Cited: Land and Environment Court of NSW, COVID-19 Pandemic Policy, (April 2021) Wollondilly Shire Council, Draft Scenic and Cultural Landscape Study, (August 2020) Greater Sydney Commissioner, Greater Sydney Region Plan - A Metropolis of Three Cities – connecting people, (March 2018) Wollondilly Shire Council, Local Strategic Planning Statement, (March 2020) Greater Sydney Commissioner, Our Greater Sydney 2056 Western City District Plan – connecting communities, (March 2018) Wollondilly Development Control Plan 2016 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Muscat Developments Pty Ltd trading as Muscat Developments (Applicant) Wollondilly Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Lancaster SC with T Poisel (Applicant) C Novak (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate