NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Pullinger [2021] NSWLEC 144 Hearing dates: 14-16, 22, 23 September 2021 Decision date: 09 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: See [164]-[166] of judgment Catchwords: POLLUTION – recovery of clean-up costs incurred by authority for pollution incident in 2018 as a debt under s 105(1) Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 – escape of PFAS contaminated water following heavy rainfall from former waste oil treatment site – whether reasonable costs and expenses incurred by authority POLLUTION – recovery of clean-up cost incurred by authority for suspected pollution incident in 2020 as a debt under s 105(1) Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 – potential escape of PFAS contaminated water from former waste oil treatment site – whether reasonable costs and expenses incurred by authority Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 100 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 33 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 20 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW), ss 3, 6, 92, 104, 105, 257, 308, Dictionary Cases Cited: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp [1948] 1 KB 223 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384; [1997] HCA 2 Environment Protection Authority v Mistring Pty Ltd (2013) 82 NSWLR 784; [2013] NSWLEC 9 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Kalls Enterprises Pty Ltd (in liq) v Baloglow (No 3) [2007] NSWCA 298 Kempsey Shire Council v Slade (2015) 214 LGERA 214; [2015] NSWLEC 135 Kempsey Shire Council v Slade (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 10 Maelstrale v Aspite (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 302 Maritime Services Board of New South Wales v Posiden Navigation Incorporated; Maritime Services Board of New South Wales v Liberian Cross Transports Incorporated [1982] 1 NSWLR 72 Mills v Meeking (1990) 169 CLR 214; [1990] HCA 6 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541; [2018] HCA 30 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 SAS Trustee Corporation v Miles (2018) 265 CLR 137; [2018] HCA 55 Slade v Kempsey Shire Council (2018) 231 LGERA 1; [2018] NSWCA 25 Sydney Seaplanes Pty Ltd v Page [2021] NSWCA 204 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 262 CLR 362; [2017] HCA 34 Whitfield v Melenewycz (2016) 92 NSWLR 624; [2016] NSWCA 235 Texts Cited: New South Wales Environment Protection Authority, Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy, (12 December 2018) Practice Note – Pre-Judgment Interest Rates Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee, Inquiry into firefighting foam contamination Part A – RAAF Base Williamtown, (February 2016) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Applicant) Robert Lenard Pullinger (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: F Berglund (Applicant) R Pullinger (Respondent) Solicitors: Hunt & Hunt Lawyers (Applicant) File Number(s): 2020/300575
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate