NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Veira v Cook [2021] NSWCA 302 Hearing dates: 9 July 2021 Date of orders: 9 December 2021 Decision date: 09 December 2021 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Meagher JA at [2]; Emmett AJA at [51] Decision: (1) Dismiss summons seeking leave to appeal (2) Order that the applicant pay the respondent's costs Catchwords: CRIME – appeal and review – application for leave to appeal from Supreme Court orders dismissing appeal from Local Court – where applicant convicted of unlawfully entering inclosed lands and interfering with business – where conduct done to remove chickens from cruel conditions – whether defence of necessity available – consideration of R v Rogers (1996) 86 A Crim R 542 Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 52 Criminal Code (Qld), s 31(1)(d) Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 (NSW), ss 4, 4B Inclosed Lands Protection Amendment Act 1997 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(h) Cases Cited: Ajayi v The Queen [2012] WASCA 126; (2012) 221 A Crim R 148 B v R [2015] NSWCCA 103 Bobbe v R [2021] NSWCCA 44 Clarkson v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 70; (2007) 171 A Crim R 1 Director of Public Prosecutions v Wille (1999) 47 NSWLR 255 Johnson v Phillips [1976] 1 WLR 65 Marwey v The Queen (1977) 138 CLR 630; [1977] HCA 68 Mattar v R [2012] NSWCCA 98 Mouse's Case (1608) 12 Co Rep 63; 77 ER 1341 Perka v The Queen [1984] 2 SCR 232 R v Dimitropoulos [2020] QCA 75; (2020) 282 A Crim R 402 R v Loughnan [1981] VR 443 R v Quayle [2005] 1 WLR 3642 R v Rogers (1996) 86 A Crim R 542 R v Z [2005] 2 AC 467 Smith v Western Australia [2010] WASCA 205; (2010) 204 A Crim R 280 Sodeman v The King (1936) 55 CLR 192 Taiapa v The Queen (2009) 240 CLR 95; [2009] HCA 53 The Gratitudine (1801) 3 C Rob 240; 165 ER 45 United States v Bailey 444 US 394 (1979) Zecevic v Director of Public Prosecutions (1987) 162 CLR 645; [1987] HCA 26 Texts Cited: Lewis Frederick Sturge, A Digest of the Criminal Law (Indictable Offences) (9th ed, 1950, Sweet & Maxwell) Sir James Stephen, Digest of the Criminal Law (1st ed, 1877, Macmillan) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maria Veira (Applicant) Peter Cook (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Singleton (Applicant) J S Caldwell (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate