R v Ibrahim [2021] NSWCCA 296

Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Ibrahim [2021] NSWCCA 296 Hearing dates: 27 September 2021 Date of orders: 10 December 2021 Decision date: 10 December 2021 Before: Johnson J at [1] Lonergan J at [5] Dhanji J at [6] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against sentence – whether manifestly inadequate – pharmacist – no consent – age differential – objective gravity – otherwise good character – residual discretion – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61I, 61HE, 66A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 12, 21A, 44, 54 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 68A Cases Cited: Afghan-Baig v R [2018] NSWCCA 15 Aliabadi v R [2020] NSWCCA 224 Application by the Attorney General under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act (2004) 61 NSWLR 305; [2004] NSWCCA 303 Awraham v R (Cth) [2021] NSWCCA 241 Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 Bravo v R [2015] NSWCCA 302 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Carroll v The Queen (2009) 254 ALR 379; [2009] HCA 13 Carter v R [2018] NSWCCA 138 CMB v Attorney General (NSW) (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Commissioner of Taxation v Baffsky (2001) 122 A Crim R 568; [2001] NSWCCA 332 Cordeiro v R [2019] NSWCCA 308 Delaney v R; R v Delaney (2013) 230 A Crim R 581; [2013] NSWCCA 150 DPP (Cth) v Pratten [No 2] (2017) 94 NSWLR 194; [2017] NSWCCA 42 Elias v The Queen; Issa v The Queen (2013) 248 CLR 483; [2013] HCA 31 Elomar v R [2018] NSWCCA 224 Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295; (1994) 74 A Crim R 241 Galli v NSW State Parole Authority [2006] NSWSC 206 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293; (1977) 51 ALJR 749 Jung v R [2017] NSWCCA 24 Khanchitanon v R [2014] NSWCCA 204 Lacey v Attorney-General (Qld) (2011) 242 CLR 573; [2011] HCA 10 Lou v R [2021] NSWCCA 120 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Markovic v The Queen; Pantelic v The Queen (2010) 30 VR 589; [2010] VSCA 105 Melbourne v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 32 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Power v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 623; [1974] HCA 26 R v Andries Dijkstra [2019] NSWDC 776 R v Arvind (NSWCCA, 8 March 1996, unreported) R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1; [2009] NSWCCA 102 R v Daley [2010] NSWCCA 223 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Geddes (1936) SR (NSW) 554 R v Grbin [2004] NSWCCA 220 R v JW (2010) 77 NSWLR 7; [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Lancaster (1991) 58 A Crim R 290 R v Shortland [2018] NSWCCA 34 R v Shortland; R v Girard [2004] NSWCCA 170 R v Simpson (2001) NSWLR 704 R v Wirth (1976) 14 SASR 291 R v Zerafa (2013) 235 A Crim R 265 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267; [2001] HCA 21 RC v R; R v RC [2020] NSWCCA 76 Salmond v R [2010] NSWCCA 141 Stewart v R [2012] NSWCCA 183 Tepania v R (2018) 275 A Crim R 233; [2018] NSWCCA 247 The Queen v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550; [2015] HCA 39 Tuncbilek v R [2020] NSWCCA 30 Texts Cited: M Bagaric, "Redefining the Circumstances in which Family Hardship should Mitigate Sentence Severity" (2019) 42(1) UNSW Law Journal 154 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Appellant) Hany Samir Ibrahim (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Newton (Appellant) T Evers (Respondent)