NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Auimatagi [2021] NSWDC 668 Hearing dates: 1 October 2021 Date of orders: 1 October 2021 Decision date: 01 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years 3 months. Non parole period of 1 year 2 months. Catchwords: CRIME - Aggravated break and enter with intent while armed SENTENCING - Relevant factors on sentence – offence provoked by threats - but broke into and ran through an empty home - drug use and drug debt precipitating factors - history of childhood trauma and response to it by self-medicating with illicit drugs- strong pro-social supports- is an ICO required - no need for ICO – rehabilitation can be managed while on parole- special circumstances- prospects of deportation not a relevant factor Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Migration Act 1958 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 5 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Nasrallah v R [2021] NSWCCA 207 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 Tepania v R [2018] NSWCC 247 Category: Sentence Parties: Anthony James Auimatagi (the offender) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr P Kondich (for the offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate