NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lambros v Urbanlux Homes Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2021] NSWSC 1615 Hearing dates: 10 December 2021 Date of orders: 14 December 2021 Decision date: 14 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Williams J Decision: Order that the amended notice of motion seeking freezing orders and the notice of motion seeking an interim injunction are dismissed. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for freezing order against third parties — whether plaintiff has a good arguable case against defendants now in liquidation and bankruptcy — where there is presently no application for leave under s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and/or s 58(3)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) — whether the plaintiff has demonstrated a good arguable case for leave — whether the third party respondents have possession of, or control or influence over assets of the defendants — whether the plaintiff is required to and has demonstrated a good arguable case for disgorgement by a third party under s 37A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) — where assets of one of the respondents which would be subject to the freezing order are jointly owned and joint owner was not a respondent to the motion PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for ex parte interim injunction — whether the proceedings raise any claim for final relief that warrants preservation of the status quo Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 58, 120, 121 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 37A Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 500 Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 25.11, 25.14, 42.7 Cases Cited: Barton v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1974) 131 CLR 370 Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199; [2001] HCA 63, Cannane v J Cannane Pty Ltd (in liq) (1998) 192 CLR 557; [1992] HCA 26 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380; [1999] HCA 18 Finn v Carelli [2007] NSWSC 261 Frigo v Culhaci [1998] NSWCA 88 Marcolongo v Chen (2011) 242 CLR 546; [2011] HCA 3 Ninemia Maritime Corporation v Trave Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG 'The Niedersachsen' [1983] 1 WLR 1412; [1984] 1 All ER 398 Papas v Grave [2013] NSWCA 308 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Public Trustee v Smith [2008] NSWSC 397 Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Ltd (No 7) [2011] FCA 405 Robmatjus Pty Ltd v Violet Home Loans Australia Pty ltd [2007] VSC 165 Saba v Plumb (2018) 97 NSWLR 278; [2018] NSWCA 60 Samimi v Seyedabadi [2013] NSWCA 279 Super Vision Resources Ltd BVI Registered No 1810534 v AC Holdings Co Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 319 Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd v Zhao (No. 2) [2018] VSC 176 Texts Cited: D. Ong, Trusts Law in Australia (5th ed, 2018, The Federation Press) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Dr Mike Lambros (Plaintiff) Urbanlux Homes Pty Ltd (ACN 618 206 652) (in liq) (First Defendant) Michael Robert Lotz (Second Defendant) Manfred Lotz (Third Respondent) Naraic Building & Pest Inspections Pty Ltd (ACN 601 152 701) in its own right and as trustee for The Naraic Trust (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms R Gall (Plaintiff) Mr G Lancaster (Solicitor) (Third and Fourth Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate