NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wassell v Ken Carr Bobcat & Tipper Hire Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1616 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 13 December 2021 Decision date: 13 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: The costs of the defendant that the plaintiffs were ordered to pay by order 9 made on 11 November 2021 are to be assessed on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: COSTS — Party/Party — Bases of quantification — Ordinary basis — Where successful defendant sought an order that the plaintiffs pay its costs on the indemnity basis for failing to accept a Calderbank offer categorised as a 'walk away' with each party paying its own costs — Where the Court accepted that the offer did not involve a sufficient level of compromise and that it was reasonable for the plaintiffs to have rejected the offer — Where costs ordered to be assessed on the ordinary basis — No point of principle Cases Cited: CEG Direct Securities Pty Ltd v Wang [2021] NSWCA 76 Fabre v Lui (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 312 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 South Western Sydney Local Health District v Gould (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 160 Taheri v Vitek (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 344 Wassell v Ken Carr Bobcat & Tipper Hire Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1415 Category: Costs Parties: David Ian Wassell (first plaintiff/ cross-defendant on the first cross-claim/ cross-claimant on the second cross-claim) Ya Jun Jiang Wassell (second plaintiff/ cross-defendant on the first cross-claim/ cross-claimant on the second cross-claim) Ken Carr Bobcat & Tipper Hire Pty Ltd (defendant/ cross-claimant on the first cross-claim) Registrar-General of New South Wales (third cross-defendant on the first cross-claim/ first cross-defendant on the second cross-claim) Representation: Counsel: J Baird (first and second plaintiffs/ cross-defendants on the first cross-claim/ cross-claimants on the second cross-claim) D Weinberger (defendant/ cross-claimant on the first cross-claim) L A Walsh (third cross-defendant on the first cross-claim/ first cross-defendant on the second cross-claim)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate