NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Poulos v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1620 Hearing dates: 2 December 2021 Date of orders: 13 December 2021 Decision date: 13 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Proceedings dismissed pursuant to UCPR r 13.4(1)(b) Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – summary disposal – dismissal of proceedings – Amended Statement of Claim struck out pursuant to UCPR r 14.28(1) – plaintiff given a further opportunity to produce an acceptable pleading – held that the proposed Further Amended Statement of Claim fails to disclose a reasonable cause of action and has a tendency to cause prejudice, embarrassment and delay – held that it is unlikely a properly formulated claim will emerge if further time is given to the plaintiff – order made for dismissal of the proceedings pursuant to UCPR r 13.4(1)(b) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 58, 91(1), 91(2) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 12.10, 13.4(1)(b), 14.28(1) Cases Cited: Kirby v Sanderson Motors Pty Ltd (2001) 54 NSWLR 135; [2002] NSWCA 44 McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 Poulos v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2021] NSWSC 971 Category: Costs Parties: Patricia Poulos (Plaintiff) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Hall (Defendant)
Solicitors: Dentons (Defendant) File Number(s): 2021/106740 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate