NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CBRE (V) Pty Limited v Trilogy Funds Management Limited [2021] NSWCA 316 Hearing dates: 1 November 2021 Date of orders: 14 December 2021 Decision date: 14 December 2021 Before: Bell P at [1]; Basten JA at [45]; Macfarlan JA at [46] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. (3) Order the appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal, including the application for leave to appeal. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – summary dismissal of proceedings – abuse of process – separate proceedings brought by different plaintiffs against same defendant – overlapping factual and legal issues – judgment delivered in first proceedings – application for leave to appeal against primary judge's refusal to summarily dismiss second proceedings – actions of plaintiff in second proceedings not unreasonable – absence of any decisive overriding consideration of public interest – no abuse of process in second proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 601FB, 601FC, 601FS Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW), s 63 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 6.19 Cases Cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Phillip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170; [1981] HCA 39 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) (2006) 226 CLR 256 Challenger Group Holdings Ltd v Concept Equity Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 374 City Pacific (in liq) v CBRE (V) Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 456 Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia v Inglis (1974) 131 CLR 311; [1974] HCA 17 In the Will of Gilbert (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318 Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361; [2011] HCA 11 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc v His Eminence Petar the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand (2008) 237 CLR 66; [2008] HCA 42 MCC Proceeds Inc v Lehman Bros International (Europe) [1998] 4 All ER 675 McKinnon v Adams [2003] VSC 116 Messier-Dowty Ltd v Sabena SA (No 2) [2000] 1 WLR 2040; [2000] EWCA 25 Moore v Inglis (1976) 50 ALJR 589; 9 ALR 509 Moubarak by his tutor Coorey v Holt (2019) 100 NSWLR 218; [2019] NSWCA 102 Murakami v Wiryadi (2010) 268 ALR 377; [2010] NSWCA 7 O'Shane v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd (2013) 85 NSWLR 698; [2013] NSWCA 315 Photios v Photios (2019) 372 ALR 264; [2019] NSWCA 158 PPK Willoughby v Baird [2019] NSWCA 48 Qantas Airways Ltd v Rohrlach [2021] NSWCA 48; (2021) 304 IR 218 Reichel v Magrath (1889) 14 App Cas 665 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Limited (2015) 256 CLR 507; [2015] HCA 28 Toronto (City) v C.U.P.E Local 79 [2003] 3 SCR 77; SCC 63 UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77; [2018] HCA 45 Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2014] AC 160 Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 538; [1990] HCA 55 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 Wigmans v AMP Limited (2019) 103 NSWLR 543; [2019] NSWCA 243 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509; [1992] HCA 34 Texts Cited: J D Heydon and M J Leeming, Jacobs' Law of Trusts in Australia (8th ed, 2016, LexisNexis) Category: Principal judgment Parties: CBRE (V) Pty Limited (Applicant) Trilogy Funds Management Limited as trustee and responsible entity of the Pacific First Mortgage Fund (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Stoljar SC / A Avery-Williams (Applicant) J C Giles SC / B G Curtin (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate