NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Richardson v R [2021] NSWCCA 304 Hearing dates: 27 September 2021 Date of orders: 17 December 2021 Decision date: 17 December 2021 Before: Johnson J at [1]; Lonergan J at [157]; Dhanji J at [158]. Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal against sentence. 2. Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against sentence – domestic violence offences – three victims – whether Applicant's mental health conditions at time of offending properly taken into account on sentence – no error demonstrated – former occupation of Applicant taken into account on sentence – potential for greater degree of hardship in custody as a result of former occupation – Applicant seeks to rely upon post-sentence fresh evidence of assaults and hardship actually experienced in custody – whether fresh evidence admissible – consideration of relevant principles – miscarriage of justice not demonstrated – appeal against sentence dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114 Baladjam v R (2018) 341 FLR 162; [2018] NSWCCA 304 Benitez v R (2006) 160 A Crim R 166; [2006] NSWCCA 21 Betts v The Queen (2016) 258 CLR 420; [2016] HCA 25 Blake v R [2021] NSWCCA 258 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Hoskins v R [2016] NSWCCA 157 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hughes v R (2015) 93 NSWLR 474; [2015] NSWCCA 330 Jones v R (1985) 20 A Crim R 142 Khoury v R (2011) 209 A Crim R 509; [2011] NSWCCA 118 Khoury v R [2014] NSWCCA 272 Mandranis v R (2021) 289 A Crim R 260; [2021] NSWCCA 97 Moiler v R [2021] NSWCCA 73 New South Wales v Bujdoso (2005) 227 CLR 1; [2005] HCA 76 R v Keir [2004] NSWCCA 106 R v Munday (1981) 2 NSWLR 177 Springer v R (2007) 177 A Crim R 13; [2007] NSWCCA 289 Taylor v R [2006] NSWCCA 7 Toller v R [2021] NSWCCA 204 York v The Queen (2005) 225 CLR 466; [2005] HCA 60 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Richardson (a pseudonym) (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms GA Bashir SC; Ms R Khalilizadeh (Applicant) Ms K Jeffreys (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate