NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Spinks v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2021] NSWCCA 308 Hearing dates: 6 December 2021 Date of orders: 16 December 2021 Decision date: 16 December 2021 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Adamson and Wright JJ at [68] Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal from the sentence imposed on him in the District Court on 1 March 2021. (2) Allow the appeal and set aside the sentence for the offence of importing a border controlled drug. (3) Sentence the applicant pursuant to s 20(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) to imprisonment for 2 years, 3 months to date from 1 March 2021. (4) Direct that the offender be released after serving the period of 15 months upon condition that he be of good behaviour for a period of 12 months to date from 31 May 2022 upon the offender entering into a recognizance himself in the sum of $2000 without security. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal and review – appeal against sentence – failure to consider properly offender's youth and prior good behaviour – offender 18 years of age at the time of offending – whether immaturity affected conduct CRIME – appeal and review – procedural fairness – failure to fix period of recognizance when sentencing – offender to be present and sentenced in open court – element of sentence contained only in orders as entered on court record CRIME – appeal and review – procedural fairness – offender's evidence consistent with defence – evidence elicited by prosecutor – offender given choice to change plea or change evidence on oath – withdrawn evidence treated as affecting credit CRIME – federal offences – drug importation offence – defence available if drugs not to be sold – evidence of predominant personal use – no evidence of intention to profit financially – factor in mitigation SENTENCING – mitigating factors – youth of offender – effects of immaturity – addiction to drug – substance abuse disorder – whether offender had control of drug use – drug use commenced at younger age Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 19AC, 19AH, 19AHA, 20 Criminal Code (Cth), ss 307.2, 307.7 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: Abdul v R [2019] NSWCCA 18 Azzopardi v The Queen [2011] VSCA 372; 219 A Crim R 369 BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; 201 A Crim R 379 Byrne v R; Cahill v R [2021] NSWCCA 185; 97 MVR 85 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51; 182 A Crim R 571 Mourtada v R [2021] NSWCCA 211 Tamer v R [2020] NSWCCA 333 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cassidy John Spinks (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I McLachlan (Applicant) Mr A McGrath (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate