NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Morley [2021] NSWDC 681 Hearing dates: 25 October 2021; 14 December 2021 Date of orders: 16 December 2021 Decision date: 16 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Evidence of police interviews not to be admitted at trial. For orders - see [110] Catchwords: CRIME — Violent offences — Aggravated detain for advantage — In company – actual bodily harm inflicted CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — pre-trial application – exclusion of admissions EVIDENCE — Admissions — Criminal proceedings — improperly obtained- illegality- impropriety- unreliability - unfair prejudice – EVIDENCE — Admissions — Criminal proceedings — improperly obtained - denial of LEPRA rights - interview conducted using body worn video and mobile phone - police cant opt out of LEPRA - Code of Practice for CRIME (Custody, Rights, Investigation, Management and Evidence - NSW Police Force Body-Worn Video Camera Standard Operating Procedures" Terms "protected suspect" - body worn video - mobi-phone - Code of Practice for CRIME (Custody, Rights, Investigation, Management and Evidence- NSW Police Force Body-Worn Video Camera Standard Operating Procedures" Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act Evidence Act 1995 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2000 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Amendment Act 2014 Surveillance Devices Act 2007 Cases Cited: Bunning v Cross (1978) 141 CLR 54 Carter v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 121 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Merhi [2019] NSWSC 1068 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Owen [2017] NSWSC 1550 Dyers v The Queen (2002) 210 CLR 285; [2002] HCA 45 Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593' [2001] HCA 72 IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300 ; [2016] HCA 14 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 NSW v Robinson (2019) 266 CLR 619; [2019] HCA 46. Papanikolaou v R; Tomaras v R [2021] NSWCCA 135 Pearse v Pearse (1846) 63 ER 950 Pfennig v The Queen (1995) 182 CLR 461; [1995] HCA 7 R v EF [2013] NSWSC 1692 R v Helmout [2000] NSWSC 208 R v Ireland (1970) 126 CLR 321 R v Munce [2001] NSWSC 1072 R v Pearce [2001] NSWCCA 447 R v Rooke NSWCCA 2/9/1997 R v Rymer [2005] NSWCCA 310 Ridgeway v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 19; HCA 66 Robinson v Woolworths Ltd [2005] NSWCCA 426 RPS v The Queen (2000) 1999 CLR 620; [2000] HCA 3 Sinclair v The Queen (1946) 73 CLR 73 CLR 316; [1946] HCA 55 The Queen v Dickman [2017] HCA 24 The Queen v Swaffield (1998) 192 CLR 159 at 185 Williams v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278; [1986] HCA 88 Texts Cited: Illegally or improperly obtained evidence: in defence of Australia's discretionary approach TF Bathurst and S Schwartz, (2016) 13 The Judicial Review R no 1 NSW Police Force Body-Worn Video Camera Standard Operating Procedures" (BWV Manual) can be found at https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/about_us/policies_procedures_and_legislation NSW Police, Code of Practice for CRIME (Custody, Rights, Investigation, Management and Evidence), 2007, National Library of Australia <https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/4348953> accessed 24 October 2021). Surveillance Devices Amendment (Police Body-Worn Video) Bill 2014, Hansard Legislative Assembly NSW 22/10/2014 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cheyne Benjamin Morley (the offender) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr R Pettit (for the offender) Mr R Taylor, Solicitor Advocate (for Director of Public Prosecutions)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate