NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Samanmitmongkhol v R [2021] NSWDC 682 Hearing dates: 02 September 2021 Date of orders: 02 September 2021 Decision date: 02 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bennett SC DCJ Decision: 1 Allow the appeal 2 Confirm the finding of guilt made by the Magistrate 3 Pursuant to s 10(1)(b) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, I find the offence proved but without proceeding to conviction, I discharge the appellant upon her entering into a Conditional Release Order pursuant to s 9(1)(b) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, for a period of 12 months from today. The CRO is subject to these conditions: (a) Be of good behaviour (b) Appear before court if called upon to do so during the term of the bond Catchwords: APPEALS — Procedure — Orders on appeal Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Liquor Act 2007 Cases Cited: CAL No 14 Pty Ltd v Motor Accidents Insurance Board; CAL No 14 Pty Ltd v Scott [2009] 239 CLR 390 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 Prior v Mole [2017] HCA 10 R v Mauger [2012] NSWCCA 51 State of New South Wales v Tomlinson [2018] NSWCA 151 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Uthumporm Samanmitmongkhol (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Gabrielle Bashir SC (senior counsel for the Appellant) Cleo Patrizi (solicitor for the Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate