NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner for Fair Trading v Radovski [2021] NSWCATAP 409 Hearing dates: 15 October 2021 Date of orders: 8 December 2021 Decision date: 08 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: L Pearson, Principal Member A Boxall, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The stay of the operation of order 2 made on 4 June 2021 is revoked. Catchwords: APPEAL – access to information – failure to comply with directions for provision of evidence – whether Tribunal erred in not permitting oral evidence –whether Tribunal erred in making findings – whether findings illogical – whether Tribunal erred in failing to draw inference – whether Tribunal erred in carrying out merits review task Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Building and Development Certifiers Act 2018 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 61 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Camilleri (GD) [2012] NSWADTAP 19 EFQ (a pseudonym) v Medical Council of New South Wales [2021] NSWCA 167 Re Gooley and Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board and Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2000] AATA 1144; (2000) 62 ALD 472 Henderson v Queensland [2014] HCA 52 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Lane v Bloc Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd [ 2021] NSWCATAP 114 Mannix v Department of Education and Communities [2014] NSWCATAD 35 Meacham v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAP 107 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 44 FLR 41 Newcastle City Council v Newcastle East Residents Action Group [2018] NSWCATAP 254 Radovski v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2021] NSWCATAD 154 Sullivan v Civil Aviation Authority (2014) 22 FCR 555; [2014] FCAFC 93 Transport for NSW v Searle [2018] NSWCATAP 93 YG & GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 Yong v Antworks Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 14 Texts Cited: None Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner for Fair Trading (Appellant) Peco Radovski (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Lambert (Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate