NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Todarello Property Investments Pty Ltd v GJA Kalra Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1678 Hearing dates: 16 June 2021; 15 and 22 September 2021; 3 December 2021 Date of orders: 20 December 2021 Decision date: 20 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Option for renewed lease validly exercised by defendant. Plaintiff's purported termination of the lease invalid. Judgment given in favour of plaintiff for arrears owed to it under the lease. Catchwords: LAND LAW – leases – options to renew – defendant lessee purported to exercise option to renew lease – plaintiff lessor served a notice under section 133E of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) – notice not served until seven months after date of expiry of lease – notice alleged breaches that existed at that date and continued thereafter – held that regardless of whether breaches are continuing, only breaches occurring up to date of expiry of lease can preclude lessor from exercising option – notice held invalid because not given within time – defendant not precluded from exercising option – declaration made that the defendant validly exercised option to renew and is entitled to a new lease LAND LAW – leases – termination of leases – plaintiff lessor served a Notice of Termination for the defendant's failure to pay $117,702.94 in rent and operating expenses – COVID-19 pandemic special provisions – where defendant an "impacted lessee" under Schedule 5 to the Conveyancing (General) Regulation 2018 (NSW) – Regulation prohibits lessors terminating leases in certain circumstances – Regulation prohibited plaintiff from terminating lease for failure to pay rent during "prescribed period" unless plaintiff complies with requirement to renegotiate in good faith rent payable under lease – plaintiff fails to comply with requirement and is not deemed to have complied due to a failure of defendant to provide information – plaintiff's termination of lease invalid – declaration made that termination invalid and of no effect Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 133E Conveyancing (General) Regulation 2018 (NSW), Schedule 5 Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Regulation 2020 (NSW) Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Amendment Regulation 2020 (NSW) Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Regulation (No 2) 2020 (NSW) Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Amendment Regulation 2021 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dee-Tech Pty Ltd v Neddam Holdings Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 251 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Todarello Property Investments Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) GJA Kalra Pty Ltd (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Afshar (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Mr J Mack (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate