NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: J. Solomon Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2021] NSWLEC 1793 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 16 December 2021 Date of orders: 22 December 2021 Decision date: 22 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bradbury AC Decision: Refer to orders below at [15] Catchwords: APPEAL – development control order – deck erected without required development consent – demolish works order – conciliation conference – agreement – substituted order Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 8.18, 9.34, Schedule 5 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 Sutherland Local Environmental Plan 2015 Category: Principal judgment Parties: J. Solomon Pty Ltd (Applicant) Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Rose (Solicitor) (Applicant) J Amy (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors: Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Applicant) Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/195250 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
The Order the subject of the appeal 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against a development control order (Order) given to the Applicant by Sutherland Shire Council (Council) on 10 June 2021. The Order concerns a steel framed covered deck (Deck) attached to the rear of the house situated on Lot 3 DP 621363 and known as 63 Bignell St Illawong (Land). 2. The Order requires the demolition and removal of the Deck. The Order was issued pursuant to s 9.34(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act), which allows a development control order to be given in accordance with the table to Part 1 of Schedule 5 to the EPA Act. Item 3 in the table allows a development control order to be issued as a "demolish works order" where a building requiring a planning approval is erected without approval. Such an order can be given to the owner of the land on which the building has been erected.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate