NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Damirdjian, C v Nominal Defendant & Zaya [2021] NSWDC 706 Hearing dates: 28, 29, 30 August; 8, 29 September; 27 October 2017; 2 February; 20 April; 25 May; 20 July; 30 August; 6 December 2018; 15, 16 July; 25 October; 5 December 2019; 8 May; 3, 17 July; 14 September; 2, 9 October; 2020; 15 – 17, 19, 22, 31 March 2021 Date of orders: 21 December 2021 Decision date: 21 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge Levy SC Decision: 1. Verdict and judgment for the first defendant against the plaintiff; 2. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the second defendant in the amount of $467,621.20; 3. The plaintiff's application for interest on damages is refused at this stage; 4. I will hear the parties on the appropriate order for costs; 5. The exhibits may be returned; 6. Liberty to apply on 7 days' notice if further or other orders are required. Catchwords: TORTS – Negligence – motor vehicle accident – plaintiff's father injured due to negligence of the driver of a motor vehicle owned by the second defendant – plaintiff suffered psychological injury – damages for mental harm – Pt 3 of Civil Liability Act 2002; DAMAGES – assessment of claimed heads of damage Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5D, s 5E, s 13, Pt 3 s 27 – s 33, Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 34, s 126, s 131 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), Sch 7, cl 5(c) Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Cervantes [2012] NSWCA 244 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Kerr [2012] NSWCA 13 Armin Damirdjian v Nominal Defendant & Zaya [2021] NSWDC 703 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588; [2011] HCA 21 Glen v Sullivan [2015] NSWCA 191 Goodrich Aerospace Pty Ltd v Arsic [2006] NSWCA 187 Graham v Baker (1961) 106 CLR 340; [1961] HCA 48 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 208 at 308 Jaensch v Coffey [1984] HCA 52; (1084) 155 CLR 549 Larson v Commissioner of Police [2004] NSWCA 126 Majkic v Bonnano [2008] NSWCA 253 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1995) 182 CLR 1; [1995] HCA 5 Optus Administration Pty Ltd v Wright [2017] NSWCA 21 Paff v Speed (1961) 105 CLR 549 Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201 Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 110 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164; [1965] HCA 34 State of NSW v Moss [2000] NSWCA 133, (2000) 54 NSWLR 536 Strong v Woolworths Ltd (2012) 246 CLR 182; [2012] HCA 5 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158; [1960] HCA 58 Texts Cited: Furzer Crestani, Assessment Handbook, 2021 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christina Araks Damirdjian (Plaintiff) The Nominal Defendant (First defendant) Sam Zaya (Second defendant from 14 September 2020) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Menzies QC with Ms B Nolan – 28 August 2017 to 16 July 2019; Mr A Parker – from 5 December 2019 (Plaintiff) Mr J Turnbull SC (First defendant) Mr W Fitzsimmons SC with Mr B Jones (Second defendant from 15 March 2021) Solicitors: Gajic Lawyers (Plaintiff) Moray & Agnew (First defendant) Sparke Helmore (Second defendant from 14 September 2020) File Number(s): 2014/269323 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate