NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Clifton [2021] NSWCA 340 Hearing dates: 10 December 2021 Decision date: 10 December 2021 Before: Leeming JA at [15], [17]; White JA at [16]; Brereton JA at [1] Decision: (1) The name of the respondent David Vincent Clifton be removed from the roll kept by the Supreme Court of New South Wales. (2) The respondent pay the applicant's costs. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONS – Legal practitioners – Solicitors – Removal from roll of solicitors – Recommendation by NCAT – Misuse of trust funds in the order of approximately $50,000 – Dishonesty and professional misconduct admitted by respondent solicitor – Submitting appearance filed – Court not required to revisit, review, or rehear proceedings – Court nevertheless required to be independently satisfied that removal from roll appropriate – Court so satisfied – Removal from roll ordered Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform General Rules 2015 (NSW), rr 45, 47 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), ss 23, 135, 138(1)(b), 145(1), 146, 147(2)(a), 148, 297(1), 302(1)(f) Cases Cited: A Solicitor v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (2004) 216 CLR 253; [2004] HCA 1 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Clifton [2021] NSWCATOD 101 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Leslie [2021] NSWCA 59 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Yoon [2020] NSWCA 141 Council of the Law Society of the ACT v Bandarage [2019] ACTSCFC 1 Dupal v Law Society of New South Wales (Court of Appeal (NSW), Kirby P, Priestley and Handley JJA, 26 April 1990, unrep) Law Society of the ACT v Powrie (2017) 12 ACTLR 184; [2017] ACTSCFC 4 Victorian Legal Services Commissioner v Henderson [2017] VSC 202 Victorian Legal Services Commissioner v Horak [2016] VSC 780 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (Applicant) David Vincent Clifton (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: PA Maddigan (Applicant) Submitting appearance (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate