NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Szeto v Situ (No 4) [2021] NSWSC 1691 Hearing dates: 13, 14 September 2021; Submissions 6 December 2021; 8 December 2021 Date of orders: 23 December 2021 Decision date: 23 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Emmett AJA Decision: See paragraph [41] Catchwords: EQUITY — General principles and maxims — They who seek equity must do equity — Equitable estates and interests — Accounting — Rental income and outgoings — Loan repayments — Occupation fees EQUITY — General principles — Equitable estates and interests — Nature of equitable interests and ownership — Beneficial ownership — Property purchased in the name of defendant alone — Joint loans applied to purchase of property Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bkassini v Sarkis [2017] NSWSC 1487 Grace v Grace (No 9) [2014] NSWSC 1239 Luke v Luke (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 3110 Ryan v Dries [2002] NSWCA 3 Szeto v Situ [2017] NSWSC 1554 Szeto v Situ (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1312 Szeto v Situ (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1489 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Livy Szeto (Plaintiff/Cross-defendant) Liming Situ (First Defendant/Cross-claimant) Representation: Counsel: A Norrie (Plaintiff/Cross-defendant) P Cutler (First Defendant/Cross-claimant)
Solicitors: Ren Zhou Lawyers (Ying Zhang) (Plaintiff/Cross-defendant) Equiton Solicitors (Defendants/Cross-claimant) File Number(s): 2014/00285214
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate