NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Balla [2021] NSWCCA 325 Hearing dates: 8 December 2021 Decision date: 23 December 2021 Before: Simpson AJA at [1]; Rothman J at [2]; Button J at [7] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME – CROWN APPEAL – alleged errors of fact – alleged mistake as to momentary inattention – alleged error in finding accident as distinct from deliberate running of red light – moral culpability – manifest inadequacy – no error of fact disclosed – no error of conclusion – sentence within range and within judge's discretion given subjective circumstances and otherwise good character – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 52A(1)(c) Cases Cited: House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 R v Khatter [2000] NSWCCA 32 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Tommy Balla (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Newton (Appellant) R Khalilizadeh (Respondent)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Appellant) Streeton Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/181856 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Citation: [2021] NSWDC 487 Date of Decision: 5 July 2021 Before: Hanley SC DCJ File Number(s): 2020/181856
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate