NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners Strata Plan No 74698 v Jacinta Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWCATAP 11 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 17 January 2022 Decision date: 17 January 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M Harrowell, Deputy President J Kearney, Senior Member Decision: 1. Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the Tribunal dispenses with a hearing in respect of the application for costs. 2. The costs order made 20 July 2020 in proceedings SC 19/00024 and SC 19/24115 is affirmed. 3. The appellant is to pay 90% of the respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed on an ordinary basis. 4. In respect of orders 2 and 3, the appellant is to levy all lot owners, other than the respondent in respect of costs payable pursuant to these costs orders. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for costs – applicability of r 38 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules where challenge to an award for damages is withdrawn but appeal continues in respect of other relief – partial success in appeal – allowance in respect of successful challenge concerning transfer of common property Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules, 2014 (NSW) Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bonita v Shen [2016] NSWCATAP 159 Doppstadt Australia Pty Ltd v Lovick & Son Developments Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2014] NSWCA 219 The Owners – Strata Plan No 30361 v Morgan [2021] NSWCATAP 50 The Owners Corporation Strata Plan No. 63341 v Malachite Holdings Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCATAP 256 The Owners Strata Plan No 74698 v Jacinta Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 387 Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 Vickery v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 80412 [2020] NSWCA 284 Category: Costs Parties: The Owners Strata Plan No 74698 (Appellant) Jacinta Investments Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Kerr SC, N Apkarian (Appellant) B Mason (Respondent )
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate