NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Amazing T Investment Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2022] NSWCATOD 6 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 18 January 2022 Decision date: 18 January 2022 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: LICENSING - real estate agent – disciplinary proceedings - failure to provide audit – conduct conceded – penalty only issue Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 Cases Cited: Bobroff v Department of Fair Trading [2019] NSWCATOD 122 Council of the Law Society of NSW v Gurusamy [2019] NSWCATOD 89 EBP v Commissioner for Fair Trading, Department of Finance, Services and Innovation [2019] NSWCATOD 157 McDonald v Director General of Social Security (1984) 1FCR 353 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31. Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Amazing T Investment Pty Ltd (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self-Represented) Department of Customer Service (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00321836 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate