Cattaneo v Commissioner of Police [2022] NSWCATAD 23

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cattaneo v Commissioner of Police [2022] NSWCATAD 23 Hearing dates: 14 December 2021 Date of orders: 20 January 2022 Decision date: 20 January 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: LICENSING – firearms – false statements in connection with application – fit and proper person – public interest Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2017 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Barlow v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2003] NSWADT 254 Bladen v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2015] NSWCATAD 240 Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9 Cook v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 204 Hook v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 250 Hunt v Commissioner of Police [2021] NCATAD 58 In Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No.2) [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 Kogias v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 297 Leatham v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 121 Lukas v Commissioner of Police, NSWPF [2021] NSWCATAD 268 McDonald v Director General of Social Security (1984) 1FCR 353 at 357 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Saxby v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 275 Sobey v Commercial Agents Board (1979) 22 SASR 70 Stamatelatos v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 156 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yuri Cattaneo (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Hartmann & Associates (Applicant) Office of General Counsel, NSW Police Force (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/249967