NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tier Architects Pty Ltd v Burwood Council [2022] NSWLEC 1036 Hearing dates: 9 December 2021 Date of orders: 6 January 2022 Decision date: 06 January 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: The orders of the Court are: (1) The applicant is granted leave to amend the application to rely on amended architectural plans. (2) The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application, pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or assessed. (3) The appeal is upheld. (4) Development Application No. 2021.1 for demolition of an existing dwelling, consolidation of 5 lots into one, alterations and additions to two existing dwellings and construction of a part 3 and 4 storey boarding house containing 75 boarding rooms accommodating 149 boarders and one manager, over two levels of basement parking, at 2, 2A and 4 Cooper Street, Strathfield, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A. (5) The exhibits, other than Exhibits 1, A, B, C, D and E, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – boarding house – local heritage item – impact on the heritage significance of the heritage item – impact on the heritage significance of the conservation area on the opposite side of the street Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 8.7, 8.15 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 55 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 Pt 2, Div 3 State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021 Burwood Local Environmental Plan 2012 cll 4.3, 4.4, 6.6 Cases Cited: Barrak v City of Parramatta Council [2018] NSWLEC 67 Grigorakis v Bayside Council [2016] NSWLEC 1573 Texts Cited: Burwood Development Control Plan Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tier Architects Pty Ltd (Applicant) Burwood Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Leggat SC (Applicant) R O'Gorman-Hughes (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate